![]() Legislation to provide for an aggressive driving offense. States, including Nevada, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Utah, also enacted State to pass a law creating a specific aggressive driving offense. Legislation other states have determined that existing laws are sufficient toĪddress serious violators of traffic laws. Some states have responded to concerns about aggressive driving by enacting New York drivers, 41 percent of drivers reported that they drive moreĪggressively when they are late or in a hurry (McCartt et al., 1998). Time pressures may also contribute to aggressive driving in a survey of Psychologically-based hypotheses for aggressiveĭriving include feeling endangered, watching other drivers break the rules,įeeling the need to retaliate, and a culture of disrespect on the roadways (Goehring,Ģ000). Surface miles increased only 1.1 percent and the number of traffic enforcement Percent, and total vehicle miles traveled increased 40 percent. Vehicles increased 19 percent, the number of licensed drivers increased 12 From 1985 to 1995 in the U.S., the number of registered motor Highway Administration (FHWA), pointed to traffic congestion as a major factor (NHTSAĪnd FHWA, 1999). ![]() Various hypotheses about the causes of aggressive driving have been advanced.Įxperts at a symposium on aggressive driving, convened by NHTSA and the Federal ![]() Traffic laws, including speeding, is needed. Tailgating (61%) and weaving (58%) a substantial minority, ranging fromĤ0 percent to 44 percent, also believed that more enforcement of other A majority believed that there is too little enforcement of.Respondents admitted that they frequently engaged in unsafeīehaviors for example, more than one in four drivers reported enteringĪn intersection just as the light was turning red within the past week.(9%), ignoring stop signs (8%), failing to yield (6%), drinking andĭriving (5%), and running red lights (5%). In addition to unsafe speeds, other types of unsafe driving commonlyĮncountered were weaving in and out of traffic (24%), tailgating (17%),ĭriver inattention (15%), unsafe lane changes (10%), unsafe passing.One-third believed that driving was more dangerous than it was a yearĪgo factors cited included heavier traffic and more cars (33%),Ĭareless and inattentive drivers (20%), faster drivers (18%), and.Had been a threat to them or their passengers within the past year. More than six in ten drivers said that another driver's behavior.In 1997, NHTSA conducted the first national survey on aggressive driving (Boyle,ĭienstfrey, and Sothoron, 1998). Problem (RSM, Inc., 1997 McCartt et al., 1998 Preusser Research Group, 1998). Surveys of drivers in various jurisdictions have indicated that driversīelieve aggressive driving is a major threat to their safety and a growing That occurred on a roadway" (NHTSA, 2000, 2001). The operator or passenger(s) of one motor vehicle or precipitated by an incident Traffic offense of aggressive driving and the criminal offense of road rage,ĭefined as "an assault with a motor vehicle or other dangerous weapon by Running a red light, or improper passing. Offenses as following too closely, changing lanes without caution or signal, Property." Accordingly, aggressive driving often includes a series of such (NHTSA), aggressive driving occurs when "an individual commits aĬombination of moving traffic offenses so as to endanger other persons or ![]() According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Over the past few years, the concept of "aggressiveĭriving" has become a major public concern and a growing focus of highway Department of Transportation - NHTSA - Evaluation of the Aggression Suppression Program, Milwaukee, Wisconsin - Chapter 1: Introduction - DOT HS 809 395 - May 2001 Chapter 1: Introduction The district court dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. The groups argued that the 1998 policy guidelines constituted a de facto legislative rule that violated the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Authorization Act of 1991. Facts:Īppellant public citizen groups filed a suit that challenged the regulatory regime governing regional recalls established in appellee federal agency's 1998 letter to automakers. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration administers the Safety Act and monitors manufacturer-initiated recalls. Generally, vehicle owners who are afforded recall notification of a safety-related defect or noncompliance are entitled to a free remedy from the manufacturer. §§ 30, 101 et seq., allows automakers to initiate voluntary recalls when a motor vehicle or its equipment contains a safety-related defector does not comply with applicable safety standards. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Authorization Act of 1991, 49 U.S.C.S. Nat'l Highway Traffic Safety Admin - 371 U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |